Home | Stanford Law Review
The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary.
Stanford Law Review Online
May 14, 2024 · Prof. Kim Forde-Mazrui of the University of Virginia responds to Sonja Starr’s print Article, The Magnet School Wars and the Future of Colorblindness.Forde-Mazrui argues that even if courts adopt the “ends-colorblindness” framework described by Starr, “alternative action” policies meant to promote diversity may still be constitutionally permissible.
Online Archive - Stanford Law Review
May 14, 2024 · As part of Stanford Law Review's 2023 Symposium on Access to Justice, this Essay explains how medical-legal partnerships--community-based programs that embed lawyers within healthcare teams--offer a promising model to address our country's justice gap.By using trusted institutions to connect people to the resources they need and embracing a bottom-up "patients-to-policy" approach, medical ...
General Law and the Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment’s Section One is central to our constitutional law. Yet its underlying principles remain surprisingly obscure. Its drafting history seems filled with contradictions, and there is no scholarly consensus on what rights it protects, …
The Making of the A2J Crisis | Stanford Law Review
Nov 7, 2023 · After decades of neglect, access to justice has roared onto legal and political radars, fueled by a growing realization—first among lawyers but increasingly among the wider American public—that the civil justice system is in crisis.
Abortion at the Margins - Stanford Law Review
In the wake of Dobbs v.Jackson Women’s Health Organization, legal scholars have proposed countless innovative strategies to secure reproductive autonomy, largely by circumventing the holding in Dobbs.This Note, however, takes a different approach. Rather than concluding that Dobbs has entirely foreclosed the pathway to constitutional abortion access, this Note considers the marginal case of ...
Lawyers Aren’t Rent - Stanford Law Review
Jul 8, 2023 · Abstract. Most low-income tenants facing eviction do not need a lawyer. They need rent money. Recent policy emphasis on right to counsel obscures the real injustice at play in our eviction courts: the monetization of residential housing, the protection of property and profit at the expense of the poor, and the exploitation of the human need for shelter as a mechanism to line the pockets of the ...
Priam’s Folly - Stanford Law Review
Volume 73 ; September 2021 2021 Student Essay Competition Winner Priam’s Folly United States v. Alvarez and the Fake News Trojan Horse Michael P. Goodyear *. Share on Twitter
Rethinking Strategy After Dobbs | Stanford Law Review
Introduction. Now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v.Wade and Planned Parenthood v.Casey, the movement for abortion rights and access finds itself in uncharted territory. 1 Open this footnote Close this footnote 1 See Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., 142 S. Ct. 2228, 2242 (2022) (overruling Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S ...
The Stanford Law Review
[401] Just 20 years ago a group of law school students and faculty members at Stanford were engaged in an exciting enterprise—a year of editorial training and other preparation to launch the Stanford Law Review in 1948-49. Twenty-five or so of the top students in the class of 1949, then in their second year, were turning out the two-issue Stanford Intramural Law Review that preceded Volume 1 ...
- Some results have been removed