The Supreme Court's ruling on property rights reveals deep divisions among judges, with a majority criticizing past judgments for economic biases.
Justice Chandrachud referred to the verdicts in the Ranganatha Reddy vs State of Karnataka case (1977), which was heard by a ...
In practical terms, the ruling means that not all private assets are open to State acquisition for public distribution ...
The majority was of the view that Justice Iyer’s “interpretation amounts to endorsing a particular economic ideology and ...
Binance and Zhao's legal team filed a motion to dismiss the SEC's amended complaint, contesting the regulator's approach to ...
As the author of the Oct. 8 Student Association Congress resolutions, I am deeply disappointed by the Judicial Board’s recent ...
Curbing government control over private property under Article 39(b) of the Constitution, the court ruled that not all ...
Christopher Bell's Disastrous Attempt disqualification at Martinsville, a bold move gone wrong, ignites NASCAR safety rule debate.
In its absence, trans victims of sexual assault are relegated to categories such as “grievous hurt,” effectively diminishing ...
While some countries practice a constitutional government, some are in the practice of relying solely on tradition and ...
Understanding the trinity of forces that drove the inflation surge in the pandemic period may provide valuable insights on ...
has stressed the need for capital operators and entire market stakeholders to adapt to the regulatory framework As virtual assets gain prominence globally, the Securities and Exchange Commission ...