So, bottom-line, IP and UDP both provide "best-effort datagram service." There are lots of protocols you can run on top of that abstraction.

Attempts to censor QUIC traffic create chance to block access to offshore DNS resolvers China’s attempts to censor traffic ...

Also an IETF standard, this nearly-identical-to-UDP protocol differs in one key way: It has a checksum (a number that is the result of a logical operation performed on all the data, which if it ...

Generally speaking, these packets won't ever benefit from maximizing the datagram, so should rarely, if at all, run into a problem with fragmentation.<BR><BR>TCP optimizes the connection more by ...

To inspect the packets of TCP and UDP they are using different parameters are frame no. On wire, frame length, IP source, IP destination, header length of the packets and also window size value etc.

When we send a UDP packet, we are using a connectionless protocol, so we are not looking for a guaranteed response. If the port is available, our UDP packet will (hopefully) be received and a ...

NDN has a stateful forwarding plane for datagram delivery (per packet and per hop) in comparisons to the IP’s stateless forwarding plane. As a matter of fact, IP forwarding by itself has no ...

So a naive UDP application will just send packets at the highest rate the network interface can support—or maybe even higher—almost certainly overloading some part of the network.

UDP is a protocol that enables the exchange of unallocated data packets over a network. The UDP buffer is memory that is assigned by the Linux operating system to temporarily contain the data ...