Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Phase 3, Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial Tsujinaka T, Yamamoto K, Fujita J, et al ...

Simple interrupted sutures and running subcuticular sutures resulted in similar cosmetic outcomes at 12 months, according to recent findings.The researchers compared cosmetic results and ...

"Skin closure options for cesarean delivery: Glue vs. subcuticular sutures." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 23 January 2017. <www.sciencedaily.com / releases / 2017 / 01 / 170123094716.htm>.

The researchers found that wound complications occurred in 8.4% of patients receiving subcuticular sutures and 11.5% of those receiving staples; no difference was observed in the rate of wound ...

The control group underwent wound closure in two layers: subcutaneous interrupted suture with 6-0 Vicryl and superficial skin with 6-0 Prolene continuous subcuticular sutures.

Buried subcuticular and deep tissue absorbable sutures are helpful to minimize tension at the skin closure. Deep sutures, however, must be used judiciously because they can act as a nidus for ...

News Release 23-Jan-2017 Skin closure options for cesarean delivery: Glue vs. subcuticular sutures Peer-Reviewed Publication Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine ...

Journal: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Published: 2024-06-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.06.044 Affiliations: 1 Authors: 5 ...

(HealthDay)—Compared with standard procedure using staples, skin closure with subcuticular sutures does not reduce the incidence of wound complications after open gastrointestinal (GI) surgery ...