Purdue University Control of Hazardous Energy Program (Lockout/Tagout) Lockout/Tagout tutorial from OSHA The OSHA rule at 29 CFR 1910.147 Equipment Safety Aerial Work Platforms Confined Space Control ...

A comprehensive lockout/tagout (LOTO) program not only helps to keep power generating plants compliant with OSHA regulations, but also increases productivity and contributes to the safety of ...

Page 2 of 5 Lockout/Tagout Challenges & Best Practices for Health Care Facilities Jul 15, 2019 Year after year, lockout/tagout (LOTO) ranks among the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ...

SHIFT CHANGE SITUATIONS 1910.147 (f) (4) states: “Specific procedures shall be utilized during shift or personnel changes to ensure the continuity of lockout or tagout protection…” When Woody removed ...

The work of servicing and maintaining a fleet of trucks presents a wide assortment of potential dangers to technicians, but the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s “lockout-tagout ...

What you need to know about Lockout/Tagout By Rob Cunningham, ANAD Safety Office May 28, 2020 ...

Most affected employers understand their obligations to comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s control of hazardous energy (commonly called “lockout/tagout”) rules ...

Tagout is the practice of leaving a label on a machine, warning other employees that it should not be touched or activated. Lockout takes the extra step by providing a physical barrier that prevents ...

Traditionally, lockout/tagout is treated as a one-off encounter each time. Even if six maintenance electricians have each performed lockout/tagout on the same machine several times, the “new guy” ...

Compliance with lockout/tagout standards prevents an estimated 120 fatalities and 50,000 injuries across the U.S. each year.

Year after year, lockout/tagout (LOTO) ranks among the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's top 10 most-cited violations, with nearly 3,000 LOTO citations last year, according to the ...

Lockout/tagout provisions for the equipment had not been implemented prior to the employee entering the area. In addition, two repeat violations at the same facility from 2009 included failing to ...