However, the fact that the 265KF, which is a Ultra 7 part, was able to outperform the Core i9-14900K suggests where the Core Ultra 9 285 should land. As with most of these Geekbench benchmark ...

Geekbench. Numbers appeared online showing the Core Ultra 285K beating the 14900K and the newly launched Ryzen 9 9950X in both single-core and multi-core performance, according to Wccftech.

However, the Core i9-14900K's Geekbench 6 multi-core score is lower than the Core i9-13900KS, the i9-13900K, and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The Core i9-14900K was tested on a Biostar Z790A-Silver ...

It’s the same story for Geekbench 6, where the Ultra 9 285K delivers 8 percent better performance over the 14900K in the multithreaded test and 2 percent more for the single-thread test while ...

As a point of comparison, the Core i9 14900K scores 3,084 ... with the Ryzen 9 9950X regularly turning out results over 23,300 in this test, although the Geekbench results browser doesn't report ...

It replaces the 14900K with slightly improved performance ... of the most popular benchmark software like Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 6. The data was sourced from the scores aggregator website ...

Because of that setup, the Core i9-14900K has more cores than the Ryzen 9 9950X, but both CPUs offer the same number of threads. Which is better really depends on what you’re doing, but AMD’s ...

Both Ryzen 9 models differ little from their predecessors in system power consumption, with the 9950X drawing a bit more and the 9900X around 30W less - nothing really to write home about.