Access to diverse materials for Large Language Models (LLMs, AI) raises legal questions on fair use and copyright ...

U.S. District Judge William Alsup said that AI company Anthropic could assert a “fair use” defense against copyright claims for training its Claude AI models on copyrighted books.

Accordingly, U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner was unpersuaded by Axanar’s arguments that it was entitled to use the fair use defence and ordered that the copyright lawsuit should move forward.

Most copyright laws, including the U.S. fair use doctrine, were written before the internet, let alone generative AI, became part of daily life. This ruling may accelerate a push toward clearer ...

In previous Snippets articles and AI News Roundups, we introduced the current lawsuits between the Recording Industry Association of America ...

Under US copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits the use of copyrighted material without explicit permission of the copyright holder, Examples of fair use include usage for the purpose ...

Fair Use Defined Fair use in U.S. copyright law considers four key factors to determine whether copyrighted content can be used without permission: 1.

A judge’s decision that Anthropic ‘s use of copyrighted books to train its AI models is a “fair use” is likely only the start of lengthy litigation to resolve one of the most hotly ...

OpenAI's defense primarily hinges on courts agreeing that copying authors' works to train AI is a transformative fair use that benefits the public, but the judge in the NYT case, Ona Wang ...

Most copyright laws, including the U.S. fair use doctrine, were written before the internet, let alone generative AI, became part of daily life.