three of which are actually remakes from 2008's Call of Duty: World at War. Let's take a look at how the maps have changed with this side-by-side comparison. For more than 13 years, Call of Duty's ...

Now we have a new entry in the Call of Duty franchise known as World at War. It comes to us from the hands of those who churned out the maligned Call of Duty 3, but this time Treyarch has managed ...

So now that "Call of Duty: World at War" (Activision Publishing Inc., Xbox 360, $59.99) is out, was the despair warranted? Yes and no. "World at War" is a respectable game in its own right ...

Which Call of Duty reigns supreme? Modern Warfare or World at War? Master debaters Charlie Barratt and Chris Antista are picking their trenches and laying it all on the line to help you decide.

Microsoft's Larry "Major Nelson" Hryb announced that Call of Duty: World at War is now backwards compatible, meaning you can play it from your Xbox One using a classic 360 disc or as a digital ...

The most recent Call of Duty to be made available on backwards compatibility, World at War, seems to have benefited from the jump to Xbox One. The Xbox 360 version of Call of Duty: World at War ...

Activision and Treyarch are taking the next instalment of the excellent Call of Duty franchise back to WWII, adding the South Pacific to the theatres of conflict.

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers. Call of Duty: World at War is a lot like its predecessor, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. In most respects, this is a good thing. The guns are ...

and it made for some really big shoes for Call of Duty: World at War to fill. If you've been living in Antarctica the past year and haven't heard, then yes, World at War returns back to the series ...