That Iraq had no nuclear capability, and little in the way of chemical and biological WMD was discussed in June, 2001, at a meeting on the issue in Washington at the Carnegie Endowment, with ...

What is surprising – if not scandalous – is that three weeks after U.S. troops moved into Baghdad, the Bush Pentagon has not yet mounted a full sweep of Iraq for weapons of mass destruction ...

British intelligence officials did not intend to mislead anyone by releasing documents in 2002 claiming Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, Britain's former spy chief said Tuesday.

No biological weapons were ever found. Janabi's information also formed the basis of a speech in 2003 by U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell before the United Nations Security Council.

History shows that a biological or chemical weapon is only as effective as the plan behind it. For example, in the 1915 Battle of Loos, the British Army launched its first chemical attack by ...

Documents obtained by WIRED show the US Department of Defense is considering cutting up to 75 percent of workers who stop the spread of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons.

In the nuclear, sir, in the biological, we also disagree with them. Not the 17 tons, no. We have a disagreement which is essential and known. We know it ourselves.

That Iraq had no nuclear capability, and little in the way of chemical and biological WMD was discussed in June, 2001, at a meeting on the issue in Washington at the Carnegie Endowment, with ...