News
Opinion: Ave Maria School of Law senior fellow Mark Smith says Florida and the courts are misapplying originalist analysis ...
Hosted on MSN10mon
Kyle Rittenhouse says he won't vote for Trump, calls him "bad on the Second Amendment"In a subsequent video defending his choice, Rittenhouse said he could not support Trump because he is "bad on the Second Amendment." Rittenhouse has become an outspoken supporter of gun rights ...
(An earlier draft of the amendment specifically defined "militia ... The following year saw the second-highest record for gun sales, at 19.9 million purchases. By now, 44% of Americans report ...
The case will decide whether the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" is ... t think that Knight's peaceable defensive carry was with bad intent. The theories of Patrick Charles The modern ...
Rahimi's case is now before the Supreme Court in a blockbuster Second Amendment challenge that may ... “Sometimes it takes bad plaintiffs (to) make good case law.” Erich Pratt, senior vice ...
Following the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen (2022), the ... broad discretion to restrict someone's Second Amendment right based on determining the ...
(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images) In his Jan. 24 op-ed, “We already know how to prevent mass killings,” Eugene Robinson briefly touched on the Second Amendment ... to stop a ‘bad guy with ...
Delvonte’s case should cause those ardent gun enthusiasts to think about just how deep their commitment to the Second Amendment goes. To be clear, I’m not saying that Delvonte is a bad person.
Would Americans agree that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a howitzer is a good guy with a howitzer? The Second Amendment language about need for “a well-regulated militia” brings up ...
In any other county, a resolution proclaiming a 2nd Amendment sanctuary might have been interpreted as a routine symbolic gesture allowing veterans, gun owners and sundry other “patriots” a ...
But five judges argued that the case might come out differently if only the Supreme Court would start treating First Amendment cases the way it has recently begun treating Second Amendment cases.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results