Barry Poulson takes an anti-Federalist position when he argues there are “serious constitutional flaws that have allowed our ...

The anti-Federalists believed that the central government would be too strong under the Constitution. Individual rights would not be protected. The Bill of Rights was a compromise, and the Seventh ...

The anti-federalists, critics of the proposed Constitution of 1787, saw danger in total judicial independence. Writing in the New York Journal, the anti-federalist known as Brutus protested that ...

During the fight over ratification in the 1780s, the “Anti-Federalists” campaigned against the Constitution, arguing that a large national government would be unable to tame the competing ...

Paul G. Summers is a lawyer. He is a former appellate and senior judge, district attorney general, and the Attorney General of Tennessee. Editor's note: This is a regular feature on issues ...

In the fractious debates of 1787-88, as the ink dried on a proposed Constitution, a cadre of skeptics—now dubbed Anti-Federalists—peered through the haze of revolutionary optimism to glimpse a ...

the architect of the U.S. Constitution, played a major role in its ratification process. He articulated his ideas in The Federalist Papers, in which he tried to address the concerns of the Anti ...

← Return to all search results for "According to Anti-Federalist George Mason, why would state rights no longer be protected? State governments would no longer exist under the Constitution.Local law ...

G.O.P. attempts to impose a kind of semifascist federalism are being trumped by ... This month, a federal judge ruled against a similar anti-drag law in Tennessee, saying the measure “reeks ...

They were opposed by the anti-Federalists, people who believed the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and worried that the original Constitution didn’t include a Bill of ...